See also: Exemplifies Exemplified Exemplifier Exemplary Exemplify Exemplification Exempt Exemptions Exemplo Exemia Exemplars Exempted Exempting Exemptive Exemplum Exemplarily Exemplarity Exemplifying
1. Haecceity: An Ontological Essay Such a result is absurd, however, since (among other worries) properties are by their nature Exemplifiables, whereas God is not an exemplifiable.
Essay, Exemplifiables, Exemplifiable
2. Properties or Exemplifiables, and (2) the view thatExemplifiables are best conceived of as abstract properties or universals. Most theistic arguments against Platonism have targeted only the second component
Exemplifiables
3. (10) Platonism, then, is a thesis that involves two components: " (1) the view that a unified account of predication can be provided in terms of properties or Exemplifiables, and (2) the view that exemplifiables are best conceived of as abstract properties or universais." (11) …
Exemplifiables, Exemplifi
4. 359) define Platonism as ‘a thesis involving two components: (1) the view that a unified account of predication can be provided in terms of properties or Exemplifiables, and (2) the view that Exemplifiables are best conceived of as abstract properties or universals’. 8.
Exemplifiables
5. Deny that one should accounted for divine predication in terms of Exemplifiables, and instead adopt a combination of substance ontology and a truthmaker theory of predication
Exemplifiables
6. Properties at all (in the ontologically loaded sense of Exemplifiables)
Exemplifiables
7. Properties are also often characterized as Exemplifiables
Exemplifiables
8. Every work-as-performance is related to its counterparts through the Repeatability-Relation (henceforth R-Relation)—in other words, the sort of relation reflecting the set of intuitions that traditional theories (I am thinking of Platonism and Nominalism especially) explain in terms of Exemplifiables …
Every, Especially, Explain, Exemplifiables
9. Thus, properties can be characterized both as predicables and as Exemplifiables
Exemplifiables
10. Relations, e.g., loving and between, can also be viewed as predicables and Exemplifiables
Exemplifiables
11. In fact, it does not even require that God has any properties at all (in the ontologically loaded sense of Exemplifiables)
Even, Exemplifiables
12. In fact, it does not even require that God has any properties at all (in the ontologically loaded sense of Exemplifiables)
Even, Exemplifiables
13. (10) Platonism, then, is a thesis that involves two components: " (1) the view that a unified account of predication can be provided in terms of properties or Exemplifiables, and (2) the view that exemplifiables are best conceived of as abstract properties or universais." (11)
Exemplifiables, Exemplifi
14. Finally, divine simplicity is said to be incompatible with any unified theory of predication that appeals to Exemplifiables.77 In Michael Bergmann and Jef- frey Brower’s defense of divine simplicity they argue divine simplicity is incom- patible with any unified theory of predication such as Platonism, Augustinianism, Aristotelianism, and
Exemplifiables
15. (A special case of this is the case in which the truthmaker is a concrete state of affairs.) The truthmaker theory is more general because it allows for truthmakers that neither are nor involve Exemplifiables.
Exemplifiables
16. Every work‐as‐performance is related to its counterparts through an ontologically important relation: the Repeatability‐relation (henceforth R‐relation), which, as we shall see, reflects the sort of intuitions that type‐token theories explain in terms of Exemplifiables and their instances.
Every, Explain, Exemplifiables
17. These are not "unknowables"; they are, in the worst case, "un-Exemplifiables"
Exemplifiables
18. Such a result is absurd, however, since (among other worries) properties are by their nature Exemplifiables, whereas God is not an exemplifiable
Exemplifiables, Exemplifiable
19. (A special case of this is the case in which the truthmaker is a concrete state of affairs.) The truthmaker theory is more general because it allows for truthmakers that neither are nor involve Exemplifiables.
Exemplifiables
20. Ici, la question n’est pas du tout de savoir si la pensée peut mouvoir le corps (Principes II, art 40), mais si tous les mouvements de la nature, concernant les corps (omnes causae particulares mutationum, quea corporibus accidunt), sont également Exemplifiables dans l’ économie de la nature créée.
Est, Exemplifiables
21. - Ils ne sont pas Exemplifiables
Exemplifiables
22. The truth of all true predications, or at least of all true predications of the form is , is to be explained in terms of a subject and an exemplifiable (however Exemplifiables are themselves to be conceived).12
Explained, Exemplifiable, Exemplifiables
23. The trouble which Plantinga sees with divine simplicity arises just as easily from the more modest assumption of the identity thesis, but since the identity thesis seems even more obviously central to theism either it is a problem for everyone (including Plantinga), or the right way around it is to deny that (God’s) attributes are Exemplifiables.
Easily, Even, Either, Everyone, Exemplifiables
24. If they are right about this, however, then perhaps a further restriction, for example to predications where â Fâ does not mention Exemplifiables, might still be worthy of consideration
Example, Exemplifiables
25. The trouble which Plantinga sees with divine simplicity arises just as easily from the more modest assumption of the identity thesis, but since the identity thesis seems even more obviously central to theism either it is a problem for everyone (including Plantinga), or the right way around it is to deny that (God’s) attributes are Exemplifiables.
Easily, Even, Either, Everyone, Exemplifiables
26. Autrement dit, toutes les propositions de K sont simultanément Exemplifiables dans D*
Exemplifiables
EXEMPLIFIABLES
English Language Learners Definition of exemplify : to be a very good example of (something) : to show (something) very clearly : to serve as an example of Salad exemplifies a healthy menu choice.
Hence, properties can also be characterized as exemplifiables, with the controversial exception of those that cannot be instantiated, e.g., some would say, round and square. It is typically assumed that no other entities can be predicated and exemplified (Aristotle, Categories, 2a).
Thus, properties can be characterized both as predicables and as exemplifiables. Relations, e.g., loving and between, can also be viewed as predicables and exemplifiables. More generally they can be treated in many respects on a par with properties and indeed they may even be viewed as kinds of properties.
Properties (also called ‘attributes,’ ‘qualities,’ ‘features,’ ‘characteristics,’ ‘types’) are those entities that can be predicated of things or, in other words, attributed to them. Moreover, properties are entities that things are said to bear, possess or exemplify.